THE GALLON ENVIRONMENT LETTER
506 Victoria Ave., Montreal, Quebec H3Y
2R5
Ph. (514) 369-0230, Fax (514) 369-3282
Email cibe@web.net Vol. 6, No. 16, July 18, 2002
This is the second of a two-part special series on
corruption.
ARTHUR ANDERSEN ACCOUNTING FIRM FOUND GUILTY OF CORRUPTION METHODS
Corporations rely on the world's big five accounting firms to provide
unbias, third-party, analysis and audits of their companies. Pension funds and
other investors have placed great confidence in these accounting firms to
provide accurate reporting both good and bad. These international accounting
firms have had a wonderful reputation. They include Arthur Andersen LLP, KPMG,
Price WaterhouseCoopers (Lybrand), Ernst & Young, and Deloitte Touche
Tohmatsu. However, these so-called independent auditors became dependent on the
companies they audited when they began to take direct consulting work from them
as well. Suddenly, companies like Arthur Andersen were making much more money
from financial consulting that from conducting audits. Andersen, based in
Chicago, was making a bundle off of Enron, and didn't want to jeopardize that.
It appears that as a result, Andersen let many questionable financial practices
continue unreported and unfixed. In the short-term it was lucrative, in the
long-term Arthur Andersen was caught out and is now facing bankruptcy. With its
plunging reputation, has gone the reputation of the whole accounting industry
and questions raised about the thousands of companies they audit. The stock
market continues to tumble with the lose of faith in financial reporting.
Arthur Andersen, an 89-year old firm, was indicted on March 14, 2002, for
shredding Enron Corp. documents. Deputy Attorney General Larry Thompson said
Andersen officials took part in "widespread criminal conduct." He described a
document-destruction effort that was systematic and aggressive. Company
officials "engaged in the wholesale destruction of tons of paperwork, and
attempted to purge huge volumes of electronic data or information," related to
Enron, according to Thompson. Andersen officials in Portland, Oregon, Chicago
and London, U.K., were also told to destroy any Enron-related documents,
the indictment said. The Department of Justice alleges that when Andersen
started shredding documents related to its work for Enron Corp., the accounting
firm knew the energy company was under a government probe. the Justice
Department set out a clear time line of Andersen's actions. On Oct. 16, Enron
issued a press release announcing a $618 million net loss for the third quarter
of 2001. The company also announced that it would cut shareholder equity by $1.2
billion. The next day, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) opened an
inquiry into Enron and requested information from the company. Two days later,
Oct. 19, Enron alerted Andersen to the SEC probe. Andersen employees began
shredding documents on Oct. 23, the indictment said Andersen last summer agreed
to pay the SEC $7 million to settle charges related to Waste Management, the
largest civil penalty ever against a Big 5 accounting firm.
It appears that Andersen had a recent growing history of poor financial
auditing. The SEC is reportedly now investigating Andersen's role as auditor for
three telecom firms, including Global Crossing, Qwest Communications
International Inc., and WorldCom Inc.. And before Waste Management, there was
Sunbeam Corp. Sunbeam imploded in 1998 when the company restated its financial
results for 1996 and 1997. Andersen, as Sunbeam's auditor, agreed to pay $110
million to settle shareholder lawsuits. Andersen prior to the Enron scandal had
annual U.S. revenues of $4.5 billion. Source, money.cnn.com/2002/03/20/news/companies/andersen_legal/
. Source, "Andersen indicted in scandal: Charge says firm shredded tons of
Files,", by Michael Hedges and David Ivanovich, Houston Chronicle, Texas, March
15, 2002. Also see the Time Magazine website at www.time.com/time/business/article/0,8599,216386,00.html
. See the Arthur Andersen website and its explanations at www.andersen.com/website.nsf/content/MediaCenterEnronResources!OpenDocument
.
ARTHUR ANDERSEN GAVE MORE THAN $140,000 TO THE BUSH/CHENEY ELECTION CAMPAIGNS
Since 1989, Andersen has contributed more than $5 million in soft money,
PAC and individual contributions to federal candidates and parties, more than
two-thirds to Republicans. During the record-breaking 1999-2000 fund-raising
cycle, very few companies outpaced Enron's prolific giving to George W. Bush. In
fact, only 11 companies gave more money to the Bush-Cheney ticket, and one of
them was Arthur Andersen, the embattled energy giant's now equally troubled
auditor. Andersen was the fifth biggest donor to Bush's White House run,
contributing nearly $146,000 via its employees and PAC. Furthermore, Andersen
fielded one of Bush's biggest individual fund-raisers that year. D. Stephen
Goddard, who until yesterday was the managing partner of Andersen's Houston
office, was one of the "Pioneers," individuals who raised at least $100,000 for
the Bush campaign during 1999-2000. Source, "Arthur Andersen: The Enron
Scandal's Other Big Donor," Source, www.opensecrets.org/alerts/v6/alertv6_38.asp
. Visit the Arthur Andersen website at www.andersen.com/ . Also see
the websites www.opensecrets.org/alerts/v6/alertv6_38.asp
; and, money.cnn.com/2002/01/17/news/v_andersen_ceo/
.
WORLD.COM TELECOMMUNICATIONS COLLAPSES FROM POOR MANAGEMENT AND ANDERSEN-ASSISTED STRANGE
ACCOUNTING
An internal audit of WorldCom Inc. long distance internet and phone
carrier, showed the company had improperly designated $3.8 billion of expenses
as capital expenditures since the beginning of 2001. The amount of these
transfers was $3.055 billion for 2001 and $797 million for first quarter 2002.
"Without these transfers, the company's reported EBITDA (earnings before
interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) would be reduced to $6.339
billion for 2001 and $1.368 billion for first quarter 2002, and the company
would have reported a net loss for 2001 and for the first quarter of 2002." That
accounting treatment had the effect of making the company appear profitable when
in fact it was losing money. As accounting tricks go, WorldCom's was simple to
the point of being obvious. "Unlike Enron, which was complicated, this is so
basic that I teach it in the second week of my class," said Roman Weil,
Professor of accounting at the University of Chicago graduate school of
business. The company filed for bankruptcy protection under Chapter 11.
WorldCom's stock listed on NASDAQ as WCOM plunged from a high of $62 in 1999 to
40 cents today. It plans to layoff about 17,000 workers after divulging that
executives had cooked the books to the tune of about $4 billion. WorldCom
The Chicago Tribune reported (July 2, 2002) that, "WorldCom's deceptive
accounting took place on a much bigger scale than that at Enron, but audit
authorities say the long distance internet and phone carrier's ruse was so
rudimentary it should have been obvious to Andersen auditors. Chicago-based
Andersen was the auditor for WorldCom until May 14, 2002, when it was replaced
by KPMG." Expenses disguised as capital expenditures are one of the first things
a sceptical auditor would examine. "That huge amount of money would involve
transactions that would have to be justified," said Arthur Bowman, editor of
Bowman's Accounting Report. While auditors don't examine every financial
transaction, he said, they are expected to look at those that are large and
potentially troublesome. A spokesman for Andersen declined to comment. WorldCom
Chief Financial Officer Scott Sullivan prepared what is described as a "white
paper" justifying his decision to treat expenses as capital expenditures, the
source said. WorldCom took network maintenance expenditures and they recorded
them as assets instead of writing them off. Analysts also point to the huge
changes in transmission equipment owned by WorldCom in 2001. In total, the
firm's assets jumped by more than $4 billion in 2001 to $48.7 billion, with
transmission equipment increasing from $20.3 billion to $23.8 billion. The
financial statements also show that WorldCom sometimes counted salaries and
interest on debt as a capital expenditure -- when clearly they are expenses. By
Robert Manor and Delroy Alexander, Chicago Tribune. See the full story at finance.pro2net.com/x34540.xml
. Also see finance.pro2net.com/x34498.xml
and, news.com.com/2100-1033-824135.html
.
WORLDCOM'S BERNIE EBBERS, LIKE ENRON'S KENNETH LAY, TAKES INVESTORS TO THE CLEANERS
WorldCom's President and Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Bernard Ebbers, took
hundreds of millions of dollars out of the company. In 1997 alone, he was
reported to have taken $383.7 million. That is a grotesque amount involving
monies taken from pension funds, public investors, and banks. Bernie Ebbers, a
bar bouncer from Canada, should have been seen for what he was when he settled
in Jackson, Mississippi - a flim-flam artist like the "Music Man". Somehow he
parlayed his small LDDS long-distance telephone service company into a force
that would acquire a well-managed company, the $30 billion MCI telephone
company. Over 14 years, Worldcom had grown by buying some 40 smaller companies.
Ebber's most significant shortcomings was his inability to successfully
operationalize the assets that he acquired, and to effectively integrate the
people that he acquired. Ebbers also proved far too ambitious in terms of his
willingness to use debt and equity (as opposed to cash) as a means of financing
a variety of significant acquisitions. Ebbers finally resigned from the company
he created April 30, 2002. See Time Magazine's article on Bernie Ebbers at www.time.com/time/digital/cyberelite/11.html
. See Forbes Magazine, "The Rise and Fall of Bernie Ebbers", at www.forbes.com/2002/04/30/0430wcom.html
. And Salon.com's article at www.salon.com/tech/log/1999/10/06/ebbers/
.
GLOB AL CROSSING THE LARGEST TELECOMMUNICATIONS FIRM TO COLLAPSE
High-speed communications services company Global Crossing, based in
Hamilton, Bermuda, started in 1997, filed for bankruptcy in 2002.
Its business partners in Asia agreed to provide a $750 million cash investment
for a majority stake in the company. Global Crossing mismanaged its money and
paid out billions of dollars to its bumbling executives and ended up going into
bankruptcy. But not before founder and CEO Gary Winnick became known as
the richest man in Los Angeles, with an estimated worth of $6 billion. His
office in Beverly Hills is reportedly a replica of the Oval Office, according to
profiles of Winnick done by the Los Angeles Times and Business Week. Using
pension fund, employee's investments and small stockholders investments in
Global Crossing, Gary Winnick, in a fit of fraudulent extravagance, is
currently renovating his $94 million palatial estate in California. You
can't see much from the ground, but an aerial view offers the full majesty of a
home with 15 bedrooms and 17 bathrooms, overlooking the Bel Air Country Club.
Within four years, Global Crossing had $22.4 billion in assets and $12.4 billion
in liabilities. Global Crossing incurred the huge debt from acquiring companies
which links more than 200 major cities in 27 countries. Lenders that include
J.P. Morgan, Merrill Lynch, Citigroup and SBC Communications are scrambling to
recover a fraction of their original investments. No one did better than Gary
Winnick, a former executive at Drexel Burnham Lambert who founded Global
Crossing in 1997. He took it public the next year and sold shares worth $734
million before the company collapsed. Global Crossing's creditors may be lucky
to get pennies on the dollar. Many employees lost significant parts of their
401(k) funds. During the Internet boom, Global Crossing, which operates a global
fiber-optic network for the transmission of phone calls and Internet data, was a
Wall Street favourite. Global Crossing's ambition, to build a 100,000-mile
fiber-optic network linking 27 countries, was an expensive proposition. As the
company sought to raise additional money in April 2000 through a secondary stock
offering, Mr. Winnick sold 8.1 million shares for $261 million. Robert
Annunziata became chief executive in 1999 and lasted only a year, but his
employment contract was lucrative, with a signing bonus of $10 million. He was
not worth it. It was not good for the company. It was a mis-appropriation of
investors' monies.
Shareholders gave Global Crossing (GBLXE.OB) a value of $55 billion in its
heyday, greater than General Motors at the time. Global Crossing was listed as
GBLX on Nasdaq. The one-time Wall Street darling suffered further from slack
demand and declining prices for bandwidth capacity. Trading in shares of Global
Crossing was halted for the bankruptcy announcement. The stock fell about 96
percent in the past year is trading in the 50 cents per share range. In November
2001, Global Crossing posted a third-quarter loss of $3.4 billion, or $3.84 per
share, compared with a loss of $602.4 million, or 69 cents a share, in the
year-earlier period. Global Crossing's stock listed on the New York Stock
Exchange as GBLXE.OB dropped from a high of just over $30.00 in 2000 to a
current 5 cents per share. See media.corporate-ir.net/ireye/ir_site.zhtml?ticker=GX&script=300
.
A five-page letter was written by Roy Olofson, vice president of finance
for Global Crossing, alleging that the company and its auditor - Arthur
Andersen, inflated revenue and cash-flow figures. Global Crossing filed for
Chapter 11 protection in January 2002. It is the fifth-largest bankruptcy case
in U.S. history. Source, "Global's Accounting Challenged," The Washington Post,
Washington, D.C., January 31, 2002. See, home.talkcity.com/ReportersAlley/thecatbirdseat/GlobalCrossing.htm
. Global Crossing said it and certain affiliates began Chapter 11 proceedings in
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York and coordinated
proceedings in the Supreme Court of Bermuda. Source, "Global Crossing files for
bankruptcy," by Reuters, Philadelphia, January 28, 2002. See the full story at ,
news.com.com/2100-1033-824135.html
. Visit the Global Crossing website at www.globalcrossing.com/xml/index.xml
. For an angry shareholders website see www.globaldoublecrossing.com/
.
QWEST COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL SUBJECT TO CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION
U.S. telecom giant Qwest Communications International, based in Denver,
Colorado, is the subject of a federal criminal probe, being scrutinized by
regulators for questionable accounting practices. , acknowledged it was also the
subject of a federal criminal probe. Shares of Qwest, briefly suspended plunged
down to $1.77 from a high in July 2000 of $57.88. Moody's Investors Service and
Fitch meanwhile cut Qwest's credit rating. The company's accounting practices
were already being probed by the Securities and Exchange Commission. The company
is saddled with some 26.6 billion dollars of debt. Qwest, formed in 1995 as a
fiber-optic company, joined the ranks of the telecom giants in 2000 with the US
$35-billion acquisition of the much-larger regional telephone group called US
West. A possible issue for Qwest is whether it properly recorded revenue, as the
company was one of the most aggressive users of "swap" transactions. Global
Crossing which declared bankruptcy this year, turned over documents in February
2002, to the SEC concerning its deals with Qwest. The SEC probe of Qwest is
based on the questionable accounting for the sale or exchange of $100 million in
fiber optic cable between Qwest and Global Crossing. Source, Agence
France-Presse.
RIGAS FAMILY SLIPS $2.3 BILLION OUT OF ADELPHIA COMMUNICATIONS
Adelphia Communications is a cable company with 5.7 million subscribers in
32 states and Puerto Rico, was the No. 6 cable provider in the United
States. Apparently it was found that the Rigas family who ran the company had
improperly borrowed $2.3 billion through various family-owned partnerships from
Adelphia, syphoning its wealth and the investment monies of thousands of honest
Americans into the Rigas's own personal bank accounts. At $1.16 a share,
Adelphia's stock price was down 94 percent from a high of $20.39 before it
was delisted from the Nasdaq. The ill-gotten debt had been kept off the
company's balance sheet and the company says it may be liable for some of the
debt. They used the money to buy company stock and pursue personal ventures.
With hundreds of millions of dollars socked away in their personal Swiss Bank
Accounts, the Rigas family allowed Adelphia to declared bankruptcy in early July
2002. They will be rich forever beyond their wildest dreams, sitting with money
that should have been used to build a better America. Deloitte & Touche, the
company's auditor at the time, reported accounting inconsistencies to the SEC,
stating that Adelphia tried to get Deloitte to sign off on the financial
statements without supplying proper information for the auditing firm to do so.
Adelphia fired Deloitte in June and hired PricewaterhouseCoopers. See the
websites finance.pro2net.com/x34614.xml
.
Adelphia Communications, based in Coudersport, Pennsylvania, reported that
a second member of its founding Rigas family resigned from a top position at
Adelphia Communications in late May 2002. Timothy Rigas resigned as chief
financial officer. His father, company founder, John Rigas, resigned in early
May 2002 as chief executive officer (CEO) when the company said it suspended an
audit by Deloitte & Touche. The Rigas family has voting control in Adelphia.
The CFO's resignation was announced on the day Adelphia was to file its annual
report to avoid being delisted from Nasdaq. Two of Adelphia/Rigas's corporate
affiliates missed making $38.3 million in interest payments in May 2002 as well.
The Rigas family was so busy taking money from the company that it failed to
file Adelphia's 2001 annual report which normally includes an audited financial
statement. Adelphia's shares closed at $5.70 in late May 2002, off 82 percent
since the company disclosed $2.3 billion in off-balance sheet loans to
partnerships run by the Rigas family. The Depository Trust, said Adelphia missed
a $23.44 million interest payment on its 9.34 percent notes maturing in 2009.
They also said its Olympus Communications unit missed a $10.63 million payment
on its 10.63 percent notes maturing in 2006. The U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission has launched a formal investigation into the dealings between
Adelphia and the Rigas family. Source news.com.com/2100-1033-916028.html?tag=rn
. Source, www.nandotimes.com/business/story/419512p-3345117c.html
.Visit Adelphia Communication's website at www.adelphia.net/ . Go to the
Adelphia Communications website at www.adelphia.net/ .
TYCO INTERNATIONAL SUSPECTED OF FRAUD
Tyco International became a $36 billion company under the direction of
Dennis Kozlowski, chairman and chief executive. Mr Kozlowski, a former
accountant, was replaced by Tyco board member and previous chief executive, John
Fort. Over a ten-year period Kozlowski transformed Tyco from a small
manufacturing firm into an industrial giant with interests ranging from fire
alarms to medical equipment. But his strategy of aggressive acquisition-led
growth was false, built on stock swaps, bad debt and the syphoning of profits
into the pockets of Tyco's executives and corporate insiders. Tyco provide
campaign contributions of $64,500 to the Democrats and $233,872 to the
Republicans. Dennis Kozlowskiv is reportedly under criminal investigation for
suspected tax evasion. The New York Times reported that New York District
Attorney Robert Morgenthau is investigating Mr Kozlowski's alleged use of
hundreds of millions of dollars moved into family trusts to purchase goods and
services without paying state sales taxes. At its peak, Tyco had a market value
of $US 120 billion, making it one of the 20 most valuable companies in the US.
Its reputation took a big hit in late January 2002 on news that it had made a
$US20 million payment to an outside director and to a charity the director
controlled as a finder's fee for a merger. Tyco's stock on NASDAQ dropped from a
high of $60.09 to $13.40 today. Listed on the New York Stock Exchange as TYC,
Tyco was one of the world's largest electronics connector companies.
Source afr.com/worldbusiness/2002/06/04/FFXJGK4O02D.html
. See the BBC website news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/business/newsid_2023000/2023228.stm
.
EUROPEAN UNION GOVERNMENTS SCRAMBLING TO ENSURE "GOOD GOVERNANCE" AMONGST THEMSELVES
To prevent an Enron type corporate debacle in Europe, European Union (EU)
finance ministers have agreed to consider toughening rules on financial
analysts, markets, and corporate governance. Citing a June 2002 due date, the
European ministers have asked corporate law experts to develop proposals for
improved transparency and closer surveillance of organizations and their audit
practices. Additionally, the finance ministers have requested that market
regulators report on risks created by trading in derivatives and hedge funds.
According to a Reuters news item, a separate group, which was set up before
Enron's collapse to look at corporate governance in the EU, will also be asked
to consider lessons from Enron and deliver a preliminary report by June. The
group's report will address internal controls and the role of independent
advisors, audit committees, and external controls, including auditing and
accounting practices and the accuracy of financial statements.
GLOBAL FUTURES AND ITS "FORTUNE 500 CLUB" EXPRESS CONCERN ABOUT CORPORATE CORRUPTION IN THE UNITED STATES
Aiming to give substance to President Bush's pledge to "end the days of
cooking the books, shading the truth and breaking our laws," an alliance of
leadership companies is calling on every Fortune 500 company to institute
independent third party verification of their corporate accountability. The
Future 500, a not-for-profit business alliance that includes many of the world's
best-known corporate brands, has launched a drive to commit a majority of
Fortune 500 companies to conduct independent measurement of their accountability
based on leading indices that rank their standing on financial, quality, social,
and environmental performance. They are asking 100 companies in California,
including 50 in the San Francisco bay area, to launch the process, which begins
with a 170-point audit of accountability, called the Corporate Accountability
Practices (CAP) Audit. The Future 500 plan would flag practices that
institutions such as the New York Stock Exchange, Dow Jones, NASDAQ, and Domini
Social Index say may have contributed to breaches at WorldCom, Vivendi, Enron,
Arthur Andersen, Merrill Lynch, Firestone, and others in the past two
years. It provides a top-line check of accounting process issues that can
lead to abuse. "Only independent third party assessment will give corporate
CEO's, directors, and shareholders the verification they need to prevent
questionable practices from occurring in the first place," said Future 500
Chairman Tachi Kiuchi, Chairman and CEO Emeritus of Mitsubishi Electric America
and a long-time champion of corporate accountability. For information contact
Bill Shireman, Global Futures, at ph. 415-706-4482, or email bill@globalfutures.org . Visit the
Global Futures website at www.globalff.org/Global_FF/gff-main.htm
. And see their "Fortune 500 Club" at www.globalff.org/Future_500/F500main.htm
.
WHY ARE KENNETH LAY, BERNIE EBBERS AND THE RIGAS BROS. STILL OUT?
Aren't those who commit crimes supposed to be charged? Why aren't they? Is
it because they contributed so much money to political parties that they are
untouchable? Is it because they know the President? Is it because they talk
well, wear nice clothes and look harmless? Is it because governments don't have
good laws and regulations to control white collar crime? Is it because
governments are complicit? These people not only spirited away tens of billions
of dollars from the American people, they have single-handedly brought the
world's largest economy to its knees. Can they do that and get away with it?
Apparently they can. We here at the CIBE Institute work with hundreds of small
to medium-sized environmental companies. They are honest and hard working. They
contribute to the community well-being, pay their taxes and operate honest
businesses to clean up the environment. They may even have invested their
hard-earned money in mutual funds for retirement that are now reeling from the
theft and collapse of those mismanaged companies. Compare the white-collar
criminals to the poor smucks that rob a minimart for $200 bucks
or a bank for $3,000. They are sent to jail without hesitation -
2 to 10 years in prison. Yet those that steal billions of dollars and contribute
a couple hundred thousand to local charities, walk free. Where is the
enforcement? Where is the fairness? Is there one law for the super-rich and
another for the average Joe? No wonder investors' confidence is waning. No
wonder people are walking away from the stock market. It is a joke - when these
kinds of things happen on such a large scale. The public is mad. People
are not going to take it anymore. Small company operators are not going to
take it anymore. The State of California is not going to take it any more. It is
time to get serious with such large-scale robberies.
THE SOUTH SEAS BUBBLE
The South Seas Bubble was one of the first great market frauds and
collapses recorded in the free enterprise world. It is the first thing taught to
stock brokers and floor traders before they can get their licences. The purpose
was to avoid any further "South Seas Bubbles" in modern-day economies. But it
looks like Enron, WorldCom, Adelphia and the others have created an even greater
"South Seas Bubble" in the United States. The South Seas Bubble was the name
given to the first great stock market crash in England in 1720. The word
"bubble" has two meanings: it is synonymous with "cheat" and can mean something
fraudulent. It also refers to an inflated body of air that can easily burst.
Both meanings operate here. The South Sea Bubble is a fascinating story of mass
hysteria, political corruption, and public upheaval. The beginning can be traced
to 1711 when the South Sea Company was given a monopoly of all trade to the
south seas. The real prize here was the anticipated trade that would open up
with the rich Spanish colonies in South America upon the conclusion of the War
of the Spanish Succession. In return for this monopoly, the South Sea Company
would assume a portion of the national debt that England had incurred during the
war. The scheme was originally promoted by Robert Harley (read Kenneth "Kenny
Boy" Lay here) who wanted to set up a financial establishment that could compete
with the Whig Bank of England, which had been created in 1694. Hence, the South
Sea Company was really a financial institution that used its monopoly primarily
as a means of attracting investors.
In 1719, the South Sea directors made a proposal to assume the entire
public debt of the British government. On April 12, 1720 this offer, sweetened
somewhat, is accepted. A number of large bribes to influential Whig politicians
like Stanhope and Sutherland and other influential people, including the royal
mistresses Madam von Platen and the Duchess of Kendal, had something to do with
the result of the vote. The bribes were paid in fictitious holdings of stock.
The Company immediately starts to drive the price of the stock up through
artificial means. South Sea stock rises steadily from January through to the
spring. And as every apparent success will soon attract its imitators, all kinds
of joint-stock companies suddenly appear, hoping to cash in on the speculation
mania. Some of these companies are legitimate but the bulk were bogus schemes
designed to take advantage of the credulity of the people. Several of the
bubbles, both large and small, had some overseas trade or "New World" aspect.
Through the pressure of the South Sea directors, the so-called "Bubble Act"
was passed on June 11, 1720 requiring all joint-stock companies to have a royal
charter. For a moment the confidence of the people was given an extra boost, and
they responded accordingly. South Sea stock had risen to 175 pounds at the end
of February 1720, up to 380 pounds by the end of March, and up to 520 pounds by
May 29. It peaks at the end of June at over 1000 pounds. By mid August the
bankruptcy listings in the London Gazette reach an all-time high, an indication
of how people bought on credit or margin. Thousands of fortunes were lost, both
large and small. The directors attempt to pump-up more speculation. They fail.
The full collapse comes by the end of September when the stock stands at 135
British Pounds Sterling. Investors scream foul against the South Sea directors.
Parliament was recalled. Mobs crowd into Westminster. A committee is form to
investigate the South Sea Company; by early 1721 it uncovers widespread
corruption and fraud among the directors, company officials and their friends at
Westminister. Unfortunately, some of the key players had already fled the
country with the incriminating records in their possession. See more about the
South Seas Bubble at the websites http://www.dal.ca/~dmcneil/sketch.html
. And at http://65.107.211.206/history/ssbubble.html
. Also see http://www.few.eur.nl/few/people/smant/m-economics/southsea.htm
.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Copyright (c) 2002
Canadian Institute for Business and
the
Environment, Montreal &
Toronto
All rights reserved.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More Letters by Garry Gallon
|